Search for: "PHYSICIAN THAT DID MRI ON" Results 1 - 20 of 519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2015, 12:12 pm by emagraken
 The Plaintiff did produce the MRI images arguing these were privileged. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:07 am by emagraken
Chalcraft did not take any issue with the cost of the MRI other than to object to the claim for interest. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 10:44 pm
Effective January 1, 2009, under California law, physicians may no longer bill patients or insurers for the technical component of diagnostic imaging services (CT, PET, or MRI) that were not rendered by the physician or someone under his or her supervision. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:38 am by The A&M Team
If your scan was performed on an older machine or your physician did not request special contrast dye, your MRI or CT scan might not show nerve fiber trauma and other brain injuries. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 12:14 pm
of referrals made by physicians for MRI and CT scans when the referring physician has a financial interest in the performance of the scan. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 11:30 am by Gregg R. Woodnick, PLLC
  Task for example a radiology practice that may own MRI machines. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:51 am
Two years and numerous doctors' visits later, a second MRI did show the tumor, now wrapped tightly around the woman's spinal column. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
In his report of his recent examination of the plaintiff and his personal review of the MRI films, the plaintiff's examining neurologist, noted his agreement with the other physician’s interpretation of the plaintiff's MRIs, and opined that the plaintiff had significant limitations in the range of motion of the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine, and that these limitations were permanent and causally related to the subject accident. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 1:09 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
The more common Stark Law violations involve physician owned imaging services (MRI CT and X-ray) and physician owned labs. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:23 am by Arfaa Law Group
Ultimately, however, the jury did not reach the question of superseding cause because they found the defendant physician’s reading of the MRI/MRA was not negligent. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
They themselves did not subject the crewman to MRIs or CT Scans. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:00 am by Jon Gelman
 The last back claim of a worker did not meet the evidential standards to sustain a claim for disability when the diagnostic tests, as interpreted by the treating physician, did not support the evidential requirements to establish the assessment of permanent disability. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:21 am by David DePaolo
Gallo did not report his history of prescription medication abuse to Mercy staff and claimed he did not have a family physician, even though Alberts was treating him at that time. [read post]